so here are the components of a world in which people would not feel the need to buy self-help books or "escapist" novels in order to fix or ignore themselves. there are eight parts:
1. everybody sells what they make directly to people that they have a "real connection" with (a chef would only cook meals for people he is friends with because he would like them to enjoy the food; a writer would give their books only to friends because she wants to share her "true emotions" with them" etc.)
2. there would be no reproductions - no photocopies or CDs or printers. (every time anything is copied, it is no longer connected with the person who created it. it is just a "thing" that other people can consume without thinking about how it was made.)
3. if somebody is feeling "bad", they are not told that the only solution is to "get better". instead, the person who is feeling "bad" tells their family/friends why they are feeling "bad", and society changes (perhaps improves) in order to make it so that nobody can feel "bad" in this way again. (like, maybe somebody feels anxious because they have no way to talk to people when they are feeling lonely, so a town square would be constructed so that this problem never happens again etc).
4. everybody would be connected with only one or two degrees of separation from everything that they buy or do. so if somebody wants to eat meat, they have to kill the animal themselves, or if somebody wanted to exploit another person (sweatshops etc) then they would have to see the effects of their exploitation on the people they are exploiting. this would make everyone directly responsible for all their actions. it would make people feel as though their lives are more valid, i think, because they would feel as though they are living more "fully".
5. there would be no "working hours" because there would be no "work". people would just have a single "life" which would involve eating and creating things and entertaining and being entertained, there would be no distinctions between "creator" and "consumer", or "work" and "play". also, nobody would have power. (this is workable, i am completely sure of it).
6. people would be free to express their "true thoughts". this would make it so that people do not feel as though they have to lie in order to "fit in" with society. it would mean that people can communicate with each other properly. it would mean that people feel as though they exist fully both inside their heads, and in the "outside" world. it would mean that there would be less "bad things" happening (like shootings or robberies or pedophilia etc) because people would not need to "bottle things up". like, if somebody was thinking about being a pedophile (or robber, murderer, whatever), then they would feel free to tell other people about their "bad" thoughts, and other people would not judge them, but would help them to stop thinking about wanting to do things that are hurtful and destructive. (i think that the majority of people who do bad things, do these things because they do not ever tell anybody about what they are thinking, so their thoughts just get more and more distorted from reality).
7. people would be able to do anything as long as it doesn't annoy anyone else ("anyone else" includes animals btw). so they could take whatever drugs they want and could do anything they wanted without feeling "trapped" by their gender, religion, race, age, amount of money they have etc.
8. people would recognise that everything that make comes from the environment, so they would only make things that are completely necessary, and would "relearn" how to enjoy things that are not man-made objects (i would call these things "nature", but i think that the word "nature" is bad because it turns "nature" into an object - sorry, that is probably confusing).
anyway, read "contributions to the revolutionary struggle..." by raoul vaneigem. i did. it is pretty good. it isn't all that abstract, it is very concise, and it made me feel both depressed and hopeful.
comment, and we will create a world together, where people do not have to buy self-help books or "escapist" novels.
8 comments:
Hmmm you know steps 1 to 8 sound like a great outline for a self-help book... *chuckle*
i think i meant it as sort of a self-help book for the whole of society, so society could come in and i would serve him/her/it (what gender pronoun do i use for the whole of society?), and sell society the book with my eight steps in it for $24.95 and society would be able to follow the steps and become "better".
i am confused now, i don't know what my post meant. ha.
far out i just wrote this massive comment about how some of this summarises why i couldn't be an architect. and also why i want to keep painting, drawing, etc. mostly dot point one and five. studying architecture is elitist and shit, everyone wants to be an "expert creative designer" who designs houses for "plebs". studying visual arts is exciting because lots of the people i've met want to encourage creativity and share. some artists are pretentious and consider themselves more creative then your average person, but this semester has made me think there are alot of people who don't want to stick to the definitions of the creator and the consumer.
all of my muscles are circus strong-men. I would never give them up. drinking, but with brain intact: too much Tao Lin. Aren't all books help?
for the above...I wrote things I felt about your post and mashed them up so it would be a poem. I hope you don't mind. I don't plan on paying you royalties for any inspiration I may have recieved.
live@thegrouchoclub,
i think that all books "help", but there are two different ways a book can help (the first is "bad" and the second is "good"):
1. you can treat books like prozac or alcohol or cigarettes, by consuming them (books) regularly in order to forget about your shitty day and feel momentarily "high".
2. you can use books as a way to "solve" your problems in order to ensure that your life is slightly less shitty overall. how can books solve existential problems? well, a sarcastic novel could make your problems seem funny, or a serious book could help to put your problems in context, or show you that other people are suffering in a similar way.
that distinction might not be very clear, i might blog about it later.
how did my post make you think about the circus? if you get rich off that poem i will feel happy for you and will tell people that i launched your career.
Good for people to know.
Post a Comment